Wittgenstein

Rules, Language & Reality

George Wrisley considers how some of Wittgenstein’s later ideas on language relate to reality.

Two of the perennial questions in 20th century analytic philosophy have been “How we are able to say or mean anything with signs, symbols, and sounds?” and “What exactly is the meaning of those signs, symbols, and sounds?” But why in the world would philosophers become so focused on language and meaning? Let me mention two very general reasons. One reason is that an enormous range of issues are touched by looking at language, and important philosophical insights can be won by doing this. Another reason is the immense influence a number of philosophers who were interested in language had on everyone else doing philosophy, especially in Britain and America.

Let me say a few words about the first reason first. The importance of Immanuel Kant for later philosophy can’t be over-emphasized.

This article is available to subscribers only.

If you are a subscriber please log in below.

Email:
Password:

To buy or renew a subscription please visit the Shop.

If you are a subscriber you can contact us to create an account.